Imagine a platform for compliance costs you $12,000 per year. Are you paying too much?
It all depends on the item you are replacing.
If the automation process eliminates hundreds of hours tedious evidence collection in a complex technology environment, $12,000 could be a good investment. If a startup with seven employees could gather the same information in the space of a few hours every month, the calculation is very different.
It’s a great way to start the look for Vanta. Do not begin with asking which platform has the most features. Ask your business how these features will save you time and money.
Automated Manufacturing is a Break-Even Point
Automating compliance isn’t inherently good or bad. Its value changes with scale. Imagine a company growing in technology that has hundreds of employees numerous cloud environments, multiple applications, and frequent access modifications. The burden of manually collecting evidence on a regular basis could be very high. Integrations that automate monitoring systems and collect evidence easily justify their expense.
Now think about a 10-person company that is preparing for its initial SOC 2. The infrastructure could be small, and evidence collection might be manageable with the need for extensive automation.
Vanta pricing is based on this variation. A sophisticated platform can provide significant capabilities, however those capabilities will only be of value when the organization actually needs they.
Compare Architecture with Brands, not just Brands
Looking for Vanta and Drata quickly becomes a feature-by practice. Both platforms are based on automation and integration, so organizations looking for this kind of solution can benefit by having a look at the frameworks available along with their integrations and services along with individual quotations and contracts.
There’s another choice to make first, however. Does your business have an interest in an integrated platform that can help you achieve compliance? Certain businesses want continuous monitoring and automated collection of evidence. Others prefer to present evidence themselves, especially when the amount of work remains minimal.
Vanta Competitors Don’t Always Follow the Same Model
Many well-known Vanta competitors compete within a similar automation-focused category. There are also platforms that have a more minimalist design which focus more on the system’s organization, rather as opposed to connectivity.
CertAssist is in the second category. CertAssist was developed by internal auditors as well as compliance consultants. It organizes controls for frameworks into a single work space and provides editable guidance on policy as well as evidence. Auditors have the ability to examine evidence submitted through a read-only interface.
It does not install agents or connect to infrastructure systems. Customers are able to upload any evidence they choose.
The consideration of access to the System in the Making
Removing integrations has an obvious drawback: you have to gather evidence manually.
This eliminates the need for integration, and the use of compliance doesn’t require a connection to the operational environment.
Both architectures are equally excellent. The key question is what choice is best for your company.
CertAssist is targeted towards teams of five to 200 employees and provides pricing information rather than having to have an actual sales call. The starting price is $225 a month, which compares to the regular cost of $375 per month.
Let Complexity Take Its Rightful Place
The needs of a 10-person company today may not be its needs when it has 100 or 500 employees.
A lighter platform can be beneficial while compliance stays simple. As the number of employees, systems frameworks, evidence and demands increase, the economics could eventually favor more automation. That’s a healthier way to purchase compliance technology Let complexity earn its place.
Don’t pay for fifty different integrations because they look impressive on the chart of comparison. They should be paid for only if the cost to do the task manually is more expensive.